Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9181 (JHR)

PABITRA DAIBAJNA ALIAS PAVITRI DEVHANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1443/2025 · 2026-02-26

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:5772] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1443 of 2025 ------ 1. Pabitra Daibajna @ Pavitri Devhana, aged about 64 years son of Kiran Daibajna 2. Chinmayee Daibajna @ Chirmay Devjana aged about 60 years, wife of Pabitra Daibajna. Both resident of Sarat Sen Compound, Near Path Mandir School, P.O.- Amdiha, P.S.- Puruliya, District- Puruliya, West Bengal, PIN-723102 3. Poulami Daibajna @ Pallavi Das, aged about 34 years wife of Soumya Das @ Somo Das resident of L.M. Ghose Street, Purulia, M Ward No.3, Munsefdanga, Durga Mandir, P.O.- Munsefdanga, P.S.- Purulia, District- Puruliya, West Bengal, PIN-723101 … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Revika Devjana @ Revika Daibajna wife of Pallav Devjana resident of village- Bakshi Tola, P.O.- Gola, P.S.- Gola, District- Ramgarh, Jharkhand, PIN-829110 … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-26-02-2026 Heard the learned P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submit that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-26.02.2026-Animesh/