HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3272 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Shri Kumar Nigam , learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners is to issue a direction to decide the objection under Section 21 (1) of UPCH Act in Case No. 1813 of 2026, stated to be pending before the respondent No. 2 within a time frame fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case filed by the petitioner is pending consideration since 2026 and the purpose of filing the present petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforesaid case within a time frame fixed by this Court. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid proposition. Considering the totality of the circumstances and submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would stand sub served if directions are issued for expeditious disposal of aforesaid case. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of by requiring the respondent No. 2 seized with the objection under Section 21 (1) of UPCH Act in Case No. 1813 of 2026 to consider and decide Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Nigam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Raju @ Prem Narayan And Another .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) the same, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months upon service of certified copy of the order of this Court, in accordance with law. September 23, 2026 Ravi Prakash WRIB No. 3272 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad