Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:24380] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6379/2026 URN: CRLMB / 11458U / 2026 Sarfaraz @ Sappa S/o Islam, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Khatakhdka Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 02/07/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 10.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Nagar, District Deeg in Criminal Misc. Bail Application (CIS) No.207/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.81/2026, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 313, 61(2) of the BNS, 2023, and Sections 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act,
2008.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature.
[2026:RJ-JP:24380] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6379/2026]
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even all the offences in which challan has been filed are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused- petitioner is in custody since 09.03.2026.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the bail application.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences in which challan has been filed are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of investigation/trial is likely to take a considerable time; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Sarfaraz @ Sappa S/o Islam arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.81/2026, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing
[2026:RJ-JP:24380] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6379/2026] and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J 21/MAHIMA