Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9178 (DEL)

SH SANJAY MEHNDIRATTA @ SANJEEV KUMAR v. SMT POONAM

RC.REV./103/2026 · 2026-05-15

Amit Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 103/2026 & CM APPL. 20470/2026 SH SANJAY MEHNDIRATTA @ SANJEEV KUMAR.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Dwivedi, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus SMT POONAM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin Sharma, Ms. Charu Nagpal, Mr. Ankit Swami Kashyap, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA O R D E R % 15.05.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeks the following prayers: - “A. Call for records of Eviction Petition bearing no. RC ARC 75/2021, titled as "Smt. Poonam vs. Sh. Sanjay Mehndiratta", decided by court of Ms. Alka Singh, Additional Rent Controller, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and/or, B. Allow the present Revision Petition and set aside/ quash the impugned judgment/ order dated 20.12.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Court of Ms. Alka Singh, Additional Rent Controller, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Eviction Petition bearing no. RC ARC 75/2021, titled as Smt. Poonam vs. Sh. San jay Mehndiratta", and allow the Leave to Defend application filed by the Petitioner; and/or, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 12:07:45 C. Pass such other/further order (s),as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case..” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions of the latter, who is present in Court today, submits that the latter shall vacate the subject shop on or before 30.06.2026, and he shall also clear all the statutory charges, including water and electricity charges. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. 4. In view thereof, learned counsel for the respondent does not press for payment of user and occupation charges. 5. Leave granted. 6. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. 7. The petitioner shall abide by his undertaking given before this Court. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 9. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith. AMIT SHARMA, J MAY 15, 2026/nk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 12:07:45