SMT. SHYAM LATA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU M.D. MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT NIGAM LTD. and ORS.
WRIA/7480/2018 · 2026-09-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9176 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9176 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7480 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Pandey, Mohd.Areeb Siddiqui, Sachin Tejashwi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ved Prakash Shukla, Manish Jauhari (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Shyam Lata Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru M.D. Madhyanchal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench