Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9171 (RAJ)

DULLICHAND S/O SHRI BABULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8206/2026 · 2026-07-03

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24897] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8206/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14988U / 2026 Dullichand S/o Shri Babulal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Hussainpur, Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Yadav For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.178/2026 registered at Police Station Sadar Alwar, District Alwar for offence under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He again submits that contraband weighing 7.67 grams of Smack, which is below the commercial quantity, was recovered from the conscious possession of the present petitioner. It is contended that co- accused Anil Kumar and Manjeet have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 30.04.2026 in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail [2026:RJ-JP:24897] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8206/2026] Application No. 5993/2026. Though nine criminal antecedents have been registered against the petitioner, but all the cases are of different nature. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 27.03.2026. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time. Hence, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Dullichand S/o Shri Babulal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 46/BRIJ MOHAN GANDHI/77