Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19715-DB WA No. 1957 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 1957 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SADASHIVAPPA S/O LATE KOMAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/A HANKALAGI VILLAGE, K. HOSAKOTE HOBLI, BARATHUR POST, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 2. CHANNAMMA D/O LATE KOMAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/A TATTEKERE VILLAGE, KUNDUR HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 201. 3. MOHANRAJU S/O LATE KOMAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/A MOODARAHALLI POST, KODLIPETE HOBLI, SOMAVARAPETE TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 236. 4. MANJULAMMA W/O MOOGAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/A DONAHALLI VILLAGE, HANUBALU POST, SAKLESHPURA TALUK,
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19715-DB WA No. 1957 of 2025
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134. 5. PUSHPANANDA S/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/A HANJALIGE VILLAGE, BHARATHURU POST, KENCHAMMANA HOSAKOTE HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT LALITHAMBA W/O LATE LINGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O HANJALIGE VILLAGE, BHARATHURU POST, KENCHAMMANA HOSKOTE HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573201. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. 5. THE TAHSILDAR ALUR TALUK, ALUR, HASSAN DISTRICT-573134. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19715-DB WA No. 1957 of 2025
6. THE LAND TRIBUNAL ALUR TALUK, ALUR HASSAN DISTRICT-573 134 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
7. B.R.CHINTAMANI, D/O LATE RANGAIYENGAR, AGE MAJOR,
8. B.R.RADHAKRISHNA, S/O LATE RANGAIYENGAR, AGE MAJOR,
9. B.R.HARI, S/O LATE RANGAIYENGAR, AGE MAJOR,
10. B.R.BHARGHAVI, D/O LATE RANGAIYENGAR, AGE MAJOR
R7 TO R10 ARE R/AT No.30/1, OLD No.19, 1ST A CROSS, 1ST A MAIN, HRUSHIKESHNAGAR, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, HOSAKEREHALLI, BENGALURU-560 070. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N.SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 TO R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN WP NO.6643/2023 AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15/04/2025 IN WP NO.6643/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE BY ALLOWING WP NO.6643/2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN, ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19715-DB WA No. 1957 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present intra Court appeal is filed impugning the
judgment and order dated 15.04.2025 passed by the writ Court on the petition filed by respondent No.1 in this appeal.
2. The appellants' names in the revenue record were entered on the basis of the order passed by the Land Tribunal. However, the said order of the Land Tribunal came to be set aside by the Supreme Court. As a result, the entries made in favour of the appellants were deleted inasmuch as the very basis on which the appellants' entries were made in the revenue record was no longer available. Thereafter, noticing these facts, the learned Single Judge has confirmed the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, whereby the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner for maintaining status quo in respect of the revenue entries made in favour of the appellants/petitioners was set aside.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19715-DB WA No. 1957 of 2025
3. We find no error in the impugned judgment and
order passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2