Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:4866 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10950 of 2025
1. Suraj Raj @ Suraj Singh, Age-21 years, S/o Rakesh Raj, R/o Vidya Nagar, Karam Chowk, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand, UID No. 3048 6799 8539, Mob. No.
9507025266.
2. Abhishek Chauhan @ Sol Age-19 Years, S/o Pradeep Chauhan, R/o Dindayal Chowk, Argora, P.O.-Doranda, P.S. Argora, Dist. Ranchi, PIN-834002, Jharkhand ....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opposite party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--- For the Petitioner : M/s. Prakash Jha, Nisha Kumari,
Vivek Singh, Advocates For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
--- 02/18.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned P.P for the State.
2.
The Petitioners have approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Argora P.S. Case No. 242/2025(N), registered for the offence under Sections 21(b)/22(b)/29 of NDPS Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion and have committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that petitioners are in jail custody since 08.11.2025; as such, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
4.
Learned P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the Petitioners and submits that there are specific allegations against the petitioners.
5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation made against these petitioners, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
18th February, 2026
jk
Uploaded on
24/02/2026