Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9166 (UTT)

VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1299/2026 · 2026-07-31

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010118912026 2026:UHC:6680 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1299/2026 Vijay Kumar --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Tajhar Qayyum, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Pranav Singh, Advocate for respondent no.3. 2. Learned State Counsel, on the basis of written instructions received from the Investigating Officer, submits that, upon conclusion of the investigation, a Final Report has been submitted before the competent Court. The written instructions furnished by the Investigating Officer are taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 31.07.2026 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a 20dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109 CB987446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.07.31 16:40:10 +05'30'