- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11496 WP No. 6769 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 6769 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR SYED JAMEEL S/O SYED MOHMOODHSAB, AGED 65 YEARS, R/AT C.B.PURA MAIN ROAD, MILLATH NAGAR, KOLAR-563101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF MANAGER UNION BANK OF INDIA, KOLAR BRANCH, SRI RANGA NEXUS, BEHIND BESCOM OFFICE, DOOMLIGHT CIRCLE, KOLAR, DISTRICTKOLAR- 563 101 2. SYED SHAKEEL NAKSH BANDI P, S/O PYARE JAN, AGED 51 YEARS, R/AT NO 71, 5TH A MAIN ROAD, WARD NO 31, BLOCK 01, SARIGE NAGARA, KOLAR, DISTRICT KOLAR- 563101 3. SHAMEER NAKSH BANDI P, S/O SRI PYARE JAN, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11496 WP No. 6769 of 2025 AGED 49 YEARS, R/AT NO 2428, 4TH CROSS, PHOOLSHA MOHALLA, BEHIND BEAF MARKET, KOLAR-563101. 4. SHAZEEB NAKSH BANDI, S/O PYARE JAN, AGED 49 YEARS, R/AT NO 2428, 4TH CROSS, PHOOLSHA MOHALLA, BEHIND BEAF MARKET, KOLAR-563101. 5. ASIF SHABAAZ.P, S/O PYARE JAN, AGED 34 YEARS, R/AT NO 2428, 4TH CROSS, PHOOLSHA MOHALLA, BEHIND BEAF MARKET, KOLAR-563101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHETTY VIGNESH SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 TO R5 ARE SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KOLAR, IN CRL MIS 17/2025, DATED 1/3/2025, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A; QUASH THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 25/7/2024, VIDE NO NIL, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 1, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO 1/BANK, TO NOT TO EVICT THE PETITIONERS WITHOUT ADOPTING THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW AS CONTEMPLATED UNDER THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11496 WP No. 6769 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to challenge the impugned order before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (‘DRT’ for short). 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. A liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the DRT within 30 days from today. 5. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PA | List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54