Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9162 (JHR)

MD. ALI HUSSAIN ALIAS ALI HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./833/2026 · 2026-02-26

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5850 1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.833 of 2026 Md. Ali Hussain @ Ali Hussain, aged about 28 years, Son of Md. Usman Miyan, resident of Hansdiha, P.O. & P.S. Hansdiha, Dist.- Dumka, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner : Mr. Durga C. Mishra, Adv. For the State : Ms. Ajay Kr. Pathak, APP Order No.02/Dated- 26.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP. 2. The petitioner has been made an accused in connection with Hansdiha P.S. Case No.59 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 520 of 2025, registered for offences punishable under Section 309(4) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act and cognizance has been taken under Sections 309(4), 61(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, which is pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and F.I.R. was lodged against three unknown persons. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has been involved in this case on the basis of confessional statement of other co-accused persons. It was also submitted that petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2025 without any incriminating circumstance appearing against him. It was also submitted that the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected by the learned court below only on the ground that petitioner is having criminal antecedent. Hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. 2026:JHHC:5850 2 | P a g e 5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I find substance in the contentions raised on behalf of petitioner. Therefore, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka in connection with Hansdiha P.S. Case No.59 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 520 of 2025. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 26.02.2026 Rahul Uploaded on 27/02/2026