APHC010240812026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 491/2026 Between: 1. CHINTALA PEETHALA GEETHA RESHMA NISHMA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, W/O PEETHALA VINAY KUMAR,D/O CHINTALA BABU RAO,DENTIST PRESENTLY IN UAE AS JOB SEEKERREPRESENTED BY SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.48-15-20GANDHIPURAM-I, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PRAKASH NAGAR POLICE STATION,RAJAMAHENDRAVARAMREP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI. 2. PEETHALA VINAY KUMAR, S/O ISSAC NEWTON VIJAY KUMAR,AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.15-1- 14/A2 ,MISSIONARY HIGH SCHOOL ROAD,NARASAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO.405, BLOCK AHALLMARK SUNNYSIDE APARTMENTS ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y SUDHAKAR 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.491 of 2026 Dated 02.09.2026 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G RAJASREE 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), challenging the order dated 09.03.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.3396 of 2025 in Crime No.59 of 2025, whereby the petition filed by the de jure complainant seeking permission to conduct a potency test on Accused No.1 before the Medical Officer of the Government Hospital, Kakinada, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the learned counsel for Respondent No.2 and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submit that, after completion of the investigation, the charge sheet has been filed; however, the same has not yet been taken on file by the learned Trial Court. 4. Be that as it may, the investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has been filed. However, the learned Trial Court has not yet taken the charge sheet on file. In view of the subsequent development, this Court is of the considered view that no further order need be passed in the present Revision Case at this stage. 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.491 of 2026 Dated 02.09.2026 5. In view of the completion of the investigation and filing of the charge sheet, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court, if so advised, during the course of the inquiry or trial, in accordance with law.. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 02.09.2026 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.491 of 2026 Dated 02.09.2026 72 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 491/2026 Date: 02.09.2026 KMS