Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9159 (RAJ)

MULEE D/O SHRI BHIKHARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9408/2026 · 2026-07-02

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24498] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9408/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17359U / 2026 Mulee D/o Shri Bhikharam, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dhani Ranasar Kalla, P.S. Dhorimanna, Distt. Balotra, Rajasthan. Presently Residing At Live In Narendra Rana R/o Magorra P.S. Jajampatti, Distt. Mathura, U.P (At Present Accused/applicant Confined In Women Reformatory Central Jail Campus Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assistant GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 104/2026 registered at Police Station Kherli Mod, District Bharatpur for offence under Sections 8/18 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovered contraband article, i.e., Opium weighing 2.50 Kgs from the possession of the petitioner is below the commercial quantity. There are no criminal antecedents registered against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is behind the bars since [2026:RJ-JP:24498] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9408/2026] 19.05.2026 and further trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026 and further trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mulee D/o Shri Bhikharam, arrested in connection with FIR No. 104/2026 registered at Police Station Kherli Mod, District Bharatpur shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 72/PARSHANT