KARAN TURI ALIAS RAM PRASAD TURI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1275/2026 · 2026-03-20
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9157 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9157 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:7882 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1275 of 2026 ------ 1.Karan Turi @ Ram Prasad Turi, son of late Haricharan Turi 2.Ram @ Ram Hansda, son of late Radhna Hansda @ Sanjhala Hansda 3.Raju @ Raju lohar, son of Babulal Lohar All resident of Bhawanichoki, PO Sahibganj, PS Jirwabari, District Sahibganj, Jharkhand … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Shekhar, Advocate. For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ----- 02/ 20.03.2026 Heard the parties.
2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by these petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 386, 387, 353 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj (M) PS case No. 12 of
2022.
3. The petitioners’ earlier anticipatory bail applications being ABA No. 6293 of 2024 with ABA No. 6386 of 2024 dated 08.05.2025 were rejected. The petitioners without their counter-part challenged the order of rejection before any higher Court nor surrendered.
4. Thus, in my opinion, the instant anticipatory bail application is not maintainable, hence, the same is dismissed as not maintainable.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 20.03.2026 Tanuj/Cp-3
Uploaded on 23.03.2026