Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9154 (RAJ)

SURESH KUMAR SON OF BIJJI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9014/2026 · 2026-07-01

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24246] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9014/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16529U / 2026 Suresh Kumar Son Of Bijji, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Pai, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.110/2026 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 307, 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 and 25 of Arms Act, 1959. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Though the allegation levelled against the present petitioner is of inflicting life-threatening injuries to complainant Rohtash but as per FIR, it reveals that all the injuries are specifically attributed to co-accused Bhoora. He again submits nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Petitioner is behind the bars since 28.05.2026 though [2026:RJ-JP:24246] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9014/2026] five cases have been reported against him, however, in all cases he is already bailed out. The son of the petitioner has committed suicide on yesterday itself, who was already on bail granted by this Court on 25.05.2026. Therefore, on humanitarian grounds as well as on the merits of the case, the petitioner may be entitled to grant of bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Suresh Kumar Son Of Bijji, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/133