IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23104 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-1999 Thana- DUMARIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Bilash Bhuiyan @ Kaushal Bharti @ Bilas Bhuiyan @ Kailash Bharti @ Bilas Jee S/O Sahdeo Bharti R/O Village- Gejna, P.S- Imamganj, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 488 of 2013 arising out of Dumariya P.S. Case No.11 of 1999 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 353, 307, 324 & 302 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 27 of the Arms Act and under Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had information that extremists have organized a meeting. When the informant along with his associates reached the place, they started fleeing away. They also started firing at the police party. There was counter firing from the police. It is further alleged that one of the police personnel has received gunshot injury and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23104 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/3 has died. It is alleged that during course of firing two extremists also died. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that there is allegation of indiscriminate firing from both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is only the satisfaction of the police that they have stated that petitioner is an extremist but there is no any evidence to show that the petitioner is maoist extremist. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.10.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that till today charge has not been framed. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. Learned APP has further submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23104 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 3/3 Additional Sessions Judge-II, Sherghati, Gayajee in connection with Sessions Trial No. 488 of 2013 arising out of Dumariya P.S. Case No.11 of 1999. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T