K.Subbulakshmi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps-Srirangam
CRL OP(MD)/3966/2026 · 2026-02-24
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 91525 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 91525 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.3966 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24/02/2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.3966 of 2026 K.Subbulakshmi ... Petitioner/Accused
Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By,The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Srirangam, Trichy City. (Crime No.39 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Leninkumar
Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar,
Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.3966 of 2026
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 87, 64 & 3(5) of BNS 2023, in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had took the victim girl to the house of the 4th accused and thereafter, the victim girl was sexually harassed by the 1st accused. Further, on 08.12.2025, the 2nd accused had entered into the house of this petitioner and sexually harassed to the victim girl. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 15.12.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.3966 of 2026
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner had involved in a very henious offence and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on perusal of the 164 statement recorded from the victim girl, it is revealed that the petitioner has committed a serious offence, and the investigation is at a preliminary stage. If the petitioner is enlarged on bail at this point of time, there is a likelihood of the petitioner indulging in activities which would be prejudicial for trial. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
(S S Y J) 24.02.2026 msrm 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.3966 of 2026 To
1. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy.
2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Srirangam, Trichy City.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.3966 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY,J. msrm
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.3966 of 2026 Date : 24.02.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis