Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9151 (CAL)

ANINDYA DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/5927/2026 · 2026-04-02

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15 02.04. 2026 Ct. No. 24 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE. WPA 5927 of 2026 Anindya Das Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Soumen Kumar Dutta, Mr. Subham Dutta. … for the petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Ld. AGP, Mr. Ranjan Saha. … for the State. 1. The petitioner’s prayer for fixation of his pay as per ROPA 2019 considering additional grade pay is pending consideration before the Additional District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Contai Sub-Division. 2. Learned Advocate representing the State respondents submits, upon instruction that, there is no provision for consideration of grant of additional grade pay while calculating initial pay under ROPA 2019. 3. As it appears that the request made by the petitioner is pending consideration before the authority, accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of directing District Inspector of Schools (SE), Purba Medinipur to consider the prayer of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order 2 and communicate the same to him at the earliest but positively within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order. 4. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the subject representation seeking consideration to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of the Court. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. 6. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)