APHC010449442026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7467/2026 Between: 1. AHAMAMD HAJIA, S/O. AHAMMED KABEER, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,R/O. BUNGLAV PURAYIDOM, VADAKKUMHAGAM,CHINNAKKADA, KOLLAM, KERELA STATE,PRESENTLY RESIDING AT LAILA MANZIL, PULLIKADA,KOLLAM, KERALA STATE. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtto enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail pending disposal of Crime No.231/2026 of Visakhapatnam Railway Police Station Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. KOLLI USHA KIRANMAYEE Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail in Crime No.231 of 2026 of Visakhapatnam Railway Police Station, Visakhapatnam, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’). 2. Ms.Kolli Usha Kiranmayee, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated by the police. He is law-abiding citizen. He is the sole breadwinners of the family. The petitioner undertake to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. In light of the foregoing submissions, the learned counsel prays that the present petition be allowed in the interest of justice. 3. Per contra, Mr.A.Sai Rohith, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner, submitting that the investigation is still underway and several material witnesses remain to be examined. It is contended that if the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, there is a strong likelihood that he may abscond, thereby hampering the ongoing investigation and evading the process of law. In view of the foregoing submissions, it is urged that the petition be dismissed. 3 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 5. As seen from the record, there are no similar adverse antecedents reported against the petitioner. The petitioner is permanent resident of Kerala State. He has got fixed abode. The petitioner was arrested on 25.07.2026 as he was found in possession and transportation of 6 Kgs. of ganja illegally. He has been in judicial custody for the past 75 days. So far 11 witnesses were examined. The material portion of the investigation is completed. Therefore, the scope of petitioner threatening the witnesses, tampering with the evidence, and hampering the investigation would not arise. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, gravity of nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail with stringent conditions. 7. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent conditions: i. The Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall be enlarged on bail subject to his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned VI Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Railways- cum-VI Additional Civil Judge Court, Visakhapatnam. 4 ii. The Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet. iii. The Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. iv. The Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall cooperate with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required. v. The Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 07.09.2026 BMS