IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19506 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2025 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1. Shubhankar Yadav @ Abhinandan Yadav Son of Shankar Yadav R/o vill - Soharwa, ward no. 10, P.S.- Choutham, Distt.- Khagaria 2. Pappu Yadav S/o Kishundeo Yadav R/o vill - Soharwa, ward no. 10, P.S.- Choutham, Distt.- Khagaria 3. Shankar Yadav S/o Biranchi Yadav R/o vill - Soharwa, ward no. 10, P.S.- Choutham, Distt.- Khagaria 4. Chandan Yadav S/o Munsi Yadav R/o vill - Soharwa, ward no. 10, P.S.- Choutham, Distt.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the State : Ms. Renuka Ratnakar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the IPC. 3. As per the prosecution case, on 13.11.2025, on a secret information regarding armed individuals forcibly cultivating disputed land in Village Singharsama, a police team reached the residence of co-accused, Shankar Yadav apprehended three persons, Angad Yadav, Gaurav Kumar and Dinesh Yadav. On search of the place of occurrence, some country made rifles, some live cartridges and ammunition belts were recovered. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19506 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it would be apparent from the first information report based on the self- statement of the Sub-Inspector that upon an information that firing was taking place at a particular place, they reached the place of occurrence and three persons were taken into custody while others managed to flee away. It is submitted that at the instance of the apprehended co-accused, firearms including country made rifles, cartridges etc. was recovered from the bushes. It is further submitted that name of the petitioners transpired on account of the statement of a personal spy and no such disclosure was made by the apprehended co-accused persons. It has also been submitted that no recovery was made from the personal or conscious possession of the petitioners and they have no criminal antecedents. 5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that name of the petitioners transpires only on the basis of suspicion and disclosure made by personal spy and no injuries have been caused in the incident coupled with the fact that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19506 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 3/3 satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S., subject to the condition that: (I) One of the bailors will be a family member/close relative. (II) The petitioners shall cooperate in investigation/trial. priyanka/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T