Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9144 (AP)

M/S.Vigneswara Constructions., v. P. VISWANATHA

CC/579/2026 · 2026-09-01

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010063772026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 579/2026 Between: 1. M/S.VIGNESWARA CONSTRUCTIONS.,, REP.BY MANAGING PARTNER, V.SURESH REDDY S/O.V.RAMANJANEYA REDDY , AGED. 36 YEARS, D.NO.25-27,SANJEEV NAGAR ,NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. P VISWANATHA, COMMISSIONER KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518001 2. SRI G RAJAKUMARI GANIYA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATES CHAIRMAN DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518001 3. SRI P VENU GOPAL, DISTRICT MINES AND GEOLOGY OFFICER NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 518501 4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522238 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt.17.10.2025 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No.28669/2025 and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of certified copy of WP 28669 of 2025 dt. 16.10.2025before the Hon’ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P VENGALA REDDY 2. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 3. T V P SAI VIHARI 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No. 28669 of 2025, dated 17.10.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.09.2026 RSD 4 21 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.579 of 2026 02.09.2026 RSD