Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9139 (RAJ)

VISHRAM MEENA S/O SHRI RAMKARAN MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7203/2026 · 2026-06-30

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7203/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13097U / 2026 Vishram Meena S/o Shri Ramkaran Meena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village And Post Samleti, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa, Currently Chief Manager Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Dausa Depot (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Deepak Chauhan with Mr.Ashok Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr.Narendra Singh Dhakar, PP Mr.Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/06/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No.96/2026, registered at the Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, District ACB District, for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per prosecution case, a sum of Rs.20,000/- has been recovered at the instance of the petitioner and he has been implicated as an accused for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2026 and after investigation, charge-sheet (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7203/2026] has already been submitted. Counsel further submits that the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that a sum of Rs.20,000/- is alleged to have been recovered at the instance of the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2026 and after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted and the trial will take its own time to conclude, hence, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vishram Meena S/o Shri Ramkaran Meena arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/8