Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9138 (RAJ)

SARDARI BAI W/O RAISINGH TANWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9719/2026 · 2026-07-03

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24697] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9719/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17999U / 2026 Sardari Bai W/o Raisingh Tanwar, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Mahuakho Police Station Aklera District Jhalawar Raj. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assistant GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 03/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 251/2022 registered at Police Station Kawai, District Baran for offence under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovered contraband article, i.e., Smack weighing 10 grams, which is below commercial quantity, was effected from the possession of the other co-accused Rakesh Meena, there is no substantive evidence available on the record indicating petitioner's involvement in the alleged crime. There are one criminal case registered against the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:24697] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9719/2026] is behind the bars since 08.06.2026, charge-sheet has already been submitted and further trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2026 and further trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sardari Bai W/o Raisingh Tanwar, arrested in connection with FIR No. 251/2022 registered at Police Station Kawai, District Baran shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 29/PARSHANT