RANA SK. ALIAS MASOOD RANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/31/2026 · 2026-01-13
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9137 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9137 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:755-DB 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. A. (DB) No. 31 of 2026
-------- Rana Sk. @ Masood Rana, aged about 35 years, son of Anisoor Rahman, resident of Village-Rabinagar, P.O.-Pakur, P.S.-Pakur (Malpaharil), District-Pakur (Jharkhand)
... ... Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
…… Respondent
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-------- For the Appellant : Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, Spl.P.P.
--------
Order No. 02/ Dated: 13th January, 2026
Heard Mr. Om Prakash, learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl.P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 06.01.2026 passed in B.P. No.02 of 2026, arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, whereby and where under the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3. It has been alleged that on account of blasting in mines, stones had fallen in the courtyard of the house of the villagers and cracks had also appeared in several houses and roads. When the said incident was protested by the villagers, the mines owner along with his associates variously armed had abused and assaulted the villagers as a result of which one of the villagers had sustained a simple injury.
4. Submission has been advanced by the leaned counsel for the appellant that several of the co-accused persons including the owner of the mines have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. It has been submitted that the appellant is in custody since 18.12.2025.
5. Learned Spl.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.
6. On consideration of the fact that the appellant was merely a labour working in the mines and similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, we while setting aside the order dated 06.01.2026 passed in B.P. No.02 of 2026, arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025, by the learned Additional
2026:JHHC:755-DB 2
Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, direct the appellant to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur.
7. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed and disposed of.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
13.01.2026 Arpit Uploaded on 14.01.2026