Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9137 (CHH)

Dr. Smt. Premlata Jangde v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPC/746/2017 · 2026-04-24

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19131 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 746 of 2017 1 - Dr. Smt. Premlata Jangde W/o Dr. Kalika Prasad Jangde, Aged About 52 Years M B B S, D G O, Occupation Medical Practise, Working As Gynaecologist And Obstetrician, R/o Jangde Cancer Care And Maternity Home, Minimata Chowk, Khutu Road, Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Directorate Of Health Services, Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Programme Officer, Nursing Home Act, Directorate Of Health Services, Office Of Head Of The Department, Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector, Kawardha, Police Station And Tehsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kawardha, Police Station And Tehsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh -- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Ms. Anushka Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Vivek Verma, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 25/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 “10.1 To call for the entire records of the case of the petitioner from the respondent authorities for kind perusal by this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 01.03.2017 (Annexure P-1). 10.3 To direct the respondent authorities to register the petitioner’s Center in accordance with law and to pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of petitioner against the respondents. 10.4 Pass any other relief/order or direction, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, along with cost of the proceedings.” 2. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has tendered her resignation from service, which was accepted from the date of its receipt i.e. 19.02.2008 vide order dated 01.08.2017. He also contended that according to his instructions he has received today, license of petitioner is also renewed for a period of five years from 29.01.2022 28.01.2027, therefore, nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that she could not able to contact the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for parties. 5. Challenge in this writ petition is to the show cause notice (Annexure P- 1) dated 01.03.2017, wherein petitioner has been treated to be an employee of State Government and had been issued a notice to show cause as to why she is running nursing home even after rejection of her application to practice and to run nursing home. 3 6. As the resignation tendered by petitioner while in service was accepted from the date of application and further that documents, which is placed on record by the learned counsel for respondents to show that the petitioner’s license has been renewed for a period of five years from 29.01.2022 to 28.01.2027, which shows that she is practicing, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. However, petitioner will be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings if any grievance subsists. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram