Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9134 (CAL)

SUMIT CHOWDHURY AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16312/2025 · 2026-04-02

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.04.2026 Sl. No.18 Ct. No.14 AN IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA/16312/2025 SUMIT CHOWDHURY AND ANR. VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Shuvro Prokash Lahiri Mr. Rajesh Naskar Mr. Ankan Mondal …for the Petitioners. Mr. Avishek Prasad Sk. Abu Jafar …for the State. Mr. Ratul Biswas Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury …for WBBPE. Md. Sarwar Jahan Sk. Nayeemul Hoque Mr. Soumojit Roychowdhury …for DPSC, Murshidabad. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya Mr. Nilay Baran Mondal …for DPSC, Kolkata 1. Mr. Shuvro Prokash Lahiri, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue pertaining to the present writ petition has been resolved. 2. In view of such submissions, the writ petition being WPA 16312 of 2025 is disposed of without any order. 3. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to be not admitted. 4. Consequently, connected applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 5. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. 6. There will be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for, shall be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible on compliance of all necessary formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.) 2