Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9132 (RAJ)

SUNDARAM @ SUNIL S/O MATADEEN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8630/2026 · 2026-07-02

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24453] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8630/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15770U / 2026 Sundaram @ Sunil S/o Matadeen, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gyan Singh Ki Dhani Tan Narayanpur, Police Station Narayanpur At Present House Saradhna Bhawan, Toliyo Ka Mohalla, Narayanpur Police Station Narayanpur District Kotputli-Behror. (Accused In District Jail Kotputli-Behror). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.M Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 108/2026 registered at Police Station Narayanpur, District Kotputli Behror for the offences under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offence under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. It is further contended that there is no criminal antecedent with regard to NDPS Act and in a case registered under Section 16/54 of Excise Act, the petitioner was acquitted. The recovered quantity of poppy straw from petitioner's possession is 30.19 kg which is below commercial quantity and [2026:RJ-JP:24453] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8630/2026] further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sundaram @ Sunil S/o Matadeen in connection with FIR No. 108/2026 registered at Police Station Narayanpur, District Kotputli Behror shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court [2026:RJ-JP:24453] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8630/2026] without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 53/CHETNA BEHRANI