[2026:RJ-JP:23772] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 8646/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15806U / 2026 Pinku S/o Late Banwari Lal, Age 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 04, Bunkar Mohalla, Shahpura, Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur Rural, At Present House No. 186, Dayanand Colony, Green Field, Police Station Surajkund, District Faridabad, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6619/2026 URN: CRLMB / 11954U / 2026 Gaurav S/o Late Ramji Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ward No- 04, Bunkar Maholla, Shapura, Police Station- Shapura, District - Jaipur Rural. (Presently In Judicial Custody At District Jail Jaipur, District- Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar, Mr. Anish Bhadala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 29/06/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 13/2026 registered at Police Station Manoharpur, [2026:RJ-JP:23772] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8646/2026] District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(2), 316(2) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They also submit that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, pray that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the arguments put forth by learned counsel for both the parties and the material made available before this Court that the charge- sheet against the accused-petitioners has been filed; that the accused-petitioners namely Pinku S/o Late Banwari Lal & Gaurav S/o Late Ramji Lal are in custody since 29.03.2026 & 31.03.2026 respectively; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners (1) Pinku S/o Late Banwari Lal & (2) Gaurav S/o Late Ramji [2026:RJ-JP:23772] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8646/2026] Lal are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/96-97