HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1686 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rahul Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri Sunil Kumar Singh for the respondent no.2. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon respondent no.1 to decide the Revision No.1752 of 2023, within a time frame as fixed by this Court. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the revision arises out of an order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut, dismissing the first appeal filed by respondent no.3 on the ground being barred by time. During the pendency of the revision, which had also filed beyond time and the application for condonation of delay has not been allowed till date, the final decree prepared by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Meerut is not being given effect to. The revision before the respondent no.1 is being adjourned without any rhyme or reason. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.1 to decide the pending revision, as noticed above, by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of three months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. April 20, 2026 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh (Arun Kumar,J.) Baburam .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad