- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17300 RFA No. 2346 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2346 OF 2019 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. C. RANJITH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O LATE DR. CHANDRASHEKAR 2. SMT. CHITRA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O LATE DR. CHANDRASHEKAR REPRESENTED BY HER PA HOLDER C.RANJITH, THE APPELLANT NO.1 BOTH ARE RESIDING AT OLD NO. 763, NEW NO 45, 'RACHIS', 2ND CROSS, P.N.S LAYOUT, SUBBAINAPALYA, BENGALURU - 560 043. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRAMOD M.N, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SWETHA G. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. S. SARAVANAN AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O SRI. M. SUNDARESAN 2. SMT. SELVI K AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS Digitally signed by BELUR RANGADHAMA NANDINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17300 RFA No. 2346 of 2019 W/O SRI. M. SUNDARESAN RESIDING AT NO. 44 7TH CROSS, SUBBAINAPALYA, BENGALURU - 560 043. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GIRISH S, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI, RULE 1 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.09.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.26293/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-74), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants and the respondents are present before the Court and they jointly submit that the dispute between the parties is amicably settled and the joint memo is filed to that effect. 2. The joint memo dated 30.08.2025 signed by the appellants and the respondents and their counsel reads as under: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17300 RFA No. 2346 of 2019 "The appellants pray that this Court be pleased to permit them to withdraw the above appeal as the parties have settled the matter out of the Court between the appellants and the respondents, as such, the appellants are not willing to continue with the case. Hence, the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.” 3. The Court has gone through the joint memo. 4. After going through the joint memo, the Court does not find any impediment to accept the same. In terms of the joint memo, the *Appeal stands disposed of. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 *Page No.3 is retyped and replaced vide chamber order dated 24.04.2026.