Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9127 (UTT)

SUHAIL ALIAS CHEENU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/314/2026 · 2026-07-29

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010132832026 2026:UHC:6522 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/314/2026 Suhail Alias Cheenu --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Nikhil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with liberty to approach the appropriate forum/Court and avail such remedy as may be available to the applicant in accordance with law. 4. Permission is granted. 5. The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Alok Mahra, J.) 29.07.2026 Mamta MAMTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f244f3e584af1449e430ef900 bf09a6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9cabfd54852c9e68911ca8 b66dd26690a191648ab5d8dd004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.07.30 10:55:13 +05'30'