Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 912 (JHR)

AJAY PASWAN v. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER, JHARKHAND

WPC/1416/2026 · 2026-03-10

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6250 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1416 of 2026 ---- Ajay Paswan, aged about 32 years, Son of Sri Jagdish Paswan, Resident of Village-Japla Choubey, P.O. Japla, P.S Hussainabad, District Palamau …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State Election Commission through its Commissioner, Jharkhand, office at Election Building, Near Market Chowk, Ratu Road, P.O. & P.S-Ratu, District Ranchi 2. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Election Officer, Medninagar, P.O. & P.S. Medninagar, District Palamau 3. The Circle Officer, Hussainabad-cum-Returning Officer, Hussainabad, P.O. & P.S. Hussainabad, District Palamau 4. Sri Pankaj Kumar, son of not known, posted as Circle Officer, Hussainabad- cum-Returning Officer, Hussainabad, P.O. & P.S. Hussainabad, District Palamau 5. Sunil Kumar Choudhary, Son of Jawahar Choudhary, Resident of Village Japla Choubey, P.O. Japla, P.S Hussainabad, District Palamau …. …. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Sweta Shukla, AC to AAG-II : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Adv. : Mrs. Shilip Sandil Gadodia, Adv. ---- 02/Dated: 10th March, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- “(i) For direction to respondent No.1 and 2 to conduct a fresh election of Ward Councellor of Ward No.14 of Hussainabad Nagar Panchayat due to the fact that nomination paper of the petitioner has been rejected without supplying the checklist by the respondent no.3 on the date of filing of nomination paper on 02.02.2026 to cure the formal defects regarding filing of the caste certificate in terms of Schedule-II. (ii). For direction to keep in abeyance the declaration of the election of respondent no.5 who is only another candidate for the Ward Councellor in Ward No. 14 during the pendency of instant writ petition. 2026:JHHC:6250 Page No.2 W.P.(C) No.1416 of 2026 (iii). For direction to respondent no.1 & 2 about the role of the Returning Officer (Respondent no.4) to act accordance with the guideline issued for the Municipal Election, 2026 in particular Clause- 27 of the Chapter-II regarding the supplying of the checklist to the candidate at the time of the submission of nomination paper and then scrutiny has been done of the nomination paper.” 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the other side has raised no objection. 5. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby, disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated 10th March, 2026 Raja/- Uploaded on 11.03.2026