Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 912 (BOM)

M/S. RIDDHI SIDDHI COMPANY THR. ITS PARTNER KAILAS C. PATIL AND ANR v. PUSHPA KHANDU PAWAR AND ORS

WP/2490/2026 · 2026-03-04

Shri M S Karnik, Shri S M Modak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ingale 49-WP2490-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2490 OF 2026 M/s. Riddhi Siddhi Company (Nee: M/s. Riddhi Siddhi Construction Company) and anr. … Petitioners Versus Pushpa Khandu Pawar and ors. .… Respondents **** Mr. Jayesh Joshi, for the Petitioners. Smt. P. J. Gavhane, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Ms. Dhanurkar, Law Officer, Revenue, present. **** CORAM : M.S.KARNIK & S.M.MODAK, JJ. DATE : 4th MARCH 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP. 2. Learned AGP in all fairness and on instructions from the respondents submits that the revision application which is the subject matter of this petition will be decided within a period of 6 months from the date of communication of this order on its own merits and in accordance with law. 1 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2026.03.05 17:56:00 +0530 Ingale 49-WP2490-26.odt 3. In view of above, the Revenue Minister is requested to decide the revision application within a period of 6 months from the date of communication of this order on its own merits and in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (S.M.MODAK, J.) (M.S.KARNIK, J.) 2