Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9119 (RAJ)

SANJU @ SONU S/O ARJUNLAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9675/2026 · 2026-07-02

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24610] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9675/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17919U / 2026 1. Sanju @ Sonu S/o Arjunlal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sevad Badi, Police Station Sadar Sikar, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Sikar). 2. Bannilal @ Banshi S/o Arjun Lal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sevad Badi, Police Station Sadar Sikar, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/07/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.131/2026 registered at Police Station Laxmangarh (Sikar), District Sikar for offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioners are that they committed the theft of ₹8,000/- in cash and silver ornaments from the house of the complainant. Petitioners are behind the bars since 09.06.2026 without any criminal past. The [2026:RJ-JP:24610] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9675/2026] case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Sanju @ Sonu S/o Arjunlal and Bannilal @ Banshi S/o Arjun Lal, be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 85/Arun