Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9119 (ALL)

ANIL CHANDRA TRIPATHI v. THE BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS

WRIB/4248/2026 · 2026-09-22

Arun Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4248 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide Revision No. 1644 of 2019, within a specific period as fixed by this Court. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the aforesaid revision filed by the respondent no. 5 is pending since 2019 before respondent no. 1. Submission is that the petitioner who is the contesting respondent in the revision has already appeared and filed his objection. Contention is that in view of the provisions contained in Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the revision itself ought to have been decided within six months from the date of its filing, however, till date it is pending. Submission is that the matter is being routinely adjourned without any justifiable reasons. 4. Having considered the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and the considering the facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide the aforementioned revision, in accordance with law, within a period of five months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. September 23, 2026 Ashok Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Balwant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Anil Chandra Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) The Board Of Revenue And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad