Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9118 (BOM)

Atmaram Ramchandra Kuril v. Ramsakal Jaiswar

IA/7227/2026 · 2026-09-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2 IA-7227-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7227 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 7812 OF 2026 Atmaram Ramchandra Kuril & ors. ..Applicants/ Petitioners Versus Ramsakal Jaiswar & ors. …Respondents Mr. Sachin Hande, i/b Lexfort Associates, for the Applicants. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 18th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants. 2. Mr. Hande, the learned Counsel for the applicants, on instructions, submits that, the office objections would be removed within a period of two weeks. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement and for the reasons assigned in the application, the delay in taking out the application for restoration of the WP(st)/7812/2026 which came to be dismissed for non-removal of office objections, stands condoned and the order dated 05th May, 2026, dismissing the writ petition for non-removal of office objections stands set aside and WP(st)/7812/2026 stands restored to file subject to the SAINATH, PA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.09.19 16:34:54 +0530 2 IA-7227-26.DOC applicant removing the office objections within a period of two weeks. 4. In the event, the office objections are removed within the said period, list the writ petition as a fresh matter for admission. 5. In case, the office objections are not removed within the said period of two weeks, this order shall stand recalled and the WP(st)/7812/2026 shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. 6. The Interim Application stands disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 2/2