GAURAV SONI S/O MADHUSUDHAN SONI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8014/2026 · 2026-07-03
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:24756] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8014/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14659U / 2026 Gaurav Soni S/o Madhusudhan Soni, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Thar School, Jodhpur Road, Osiyan, P.s. Osiyan, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 03/07/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.230/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) for offences under Sections 318(2) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the similarly situated co-accused, Saagar Soni, has already been enlarged on bail by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated
17.11.2025. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since
13.09.2025. Though three criminal cases are registered against him, he has been granted bail in all of them. The charge-sheet has
[2026:RJ-JP:24756] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8014/2026] already been filed, and the case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently on the ground of the parity, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Gaurav Soni S/o Madhusudhan Soni, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 43/Arun