Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 91138 (MAD)

G.Tamilarasi v. The State of Tamilnadu

WP Crl.(MD)/1015/2026 · 2026-02-24

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl.(MD) NO. 1015 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.Crl.(MD) No. 1015 of 2026 G. Tamilarasi Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu The Superintendent of Police Theni District, Theni. 2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police Chinnamanur Police Station, Theni District, Theni. 3. Ramu 4. Suganthi 5. Jegan Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.R. Shankar Ganesh For Respondent(s): Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.side), for R-1 & R-2 Prayer: To Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to conclude the enquiry by taking appropriate action as against the accused persons based on the petitioners representation dated 19.11.2025. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl.(MD) NO. 1015 of 2026 ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to conclude the enquiry by taking appropriate action as against the accused persons based on the petitioner's representation dated 19.11.2025. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that there were rival groups and that a dispute is pending between the two groups. He further submitted that three First Information Reports have already been registered and referred to the Revenue Divisional Officer. Hence, this petition cannot be maintained. 3. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner specifically pointed out that the rival group had looted jewels, money, and other articles in the absence of the petitioner. 4. Therefore, the respondent police are directed to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 19.11.2025 regarding the looted jewels, money, and articles, and to take appropriate action in accordance with law. If any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall proceed in accordance with law. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl.(MD) NO. 1015 of 2026 5. With these observations, this writp petition is disposed of. No Costs. 24.02.2026 KSA To 1. The Superintendent of Police Theni District, Theni. 2. The Inspector Of Police Chinnamanur Police Station, Theni District, Theni. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl.(MD) NO. 1015 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY.J, KSA WP Crl.(MD) No.1015 of 2026 24.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis