APHC010079872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 275/2025 Between: 1. GANJI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O LATE SUBBARAYUDU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 2. GANJI SEETHAMMA, W/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH, FEMALE, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. 3. GANJI MURALI @ VENKATA MURALI, MALE, AGED ABOUT 23 YEASRS. 4. GANJI BLAJI, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH MALE, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATHI. 2. S H O, SIDHOUT POLICE STATION, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. GARY LAKSHMAN, S/O. LATE SUBBARAYUDU, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O. SKR NAGAR, MADAVARAM - 1, SIDHUOT MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 07.10.2025 IN I.A.NO.3 OF 2025 IN CRL.R.C.NO.275 OF 2025. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 2 1. MANUBROLU SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. DR G V RAVI 3. LEGAL AID The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri Manubrolu Srinivasa Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the charges having already been framed by the learned Trial Court upon due consideration of the material available on record, the stage of discharge stands eclipsed, and consequently, no application seeking discharge would be maintainable thereafter. 3. Taking note of the aforesaid submission and upon consideration of the material placed before this Court, this Court finds no warrant for interference in the impugned proceedings. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. However, having regard to the nature of the case and in the interest of ensuring a fair, expeditious and efficacious administration of criminal justice, the learned Trial Court is directed to accord priority to the matter and make every endeavour to conclude the trial at the earliest, preferably within a period of one year from 3 the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The learned Trial Court shall thereafter submit a compliance report to the Registrar (Judicial) forthwith. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 03.09.2026 VTS