DR. SUMANLATA SAINI D/O SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR SAINI, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/9806/2026 · 2026-07-03
Rekha Borana
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9112 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9112 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:24682] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9806/2026 URN: CW / 21889U / 2026
1. Dr. Sumanlata Saini D/o Shri Narendra Kumar Saini, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ladpur Road, Kotkasim, Khairthal, Tijara (Raj.)
2. Shalu D/o Shri Jilesingh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Rampur, Khairthal Tijara, Alwar
3. Smt. Rajani Mahawar D/o Shri Shriram Gupta, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kotkasim, Khairthal, Tijara
4. Pawan Kumar S/o Shri Bhrama Sing, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jatwada, Ward No. 12, Khairthal, Tijara
5. Dr. Deepak Sharma S/o Shri Ramgopal Sharma, R/o Behind Manohardas Samadhi, Link Road, Churu (Raj.)
6. Dr. Hetram S/o Shri Kanaram, R/o Deego Ka Mohalla, Purabsar, Hanumangarh (Raj.)
7. Rahul Kumar Mudgal S/o Shri Brijesh Narayan Mudgal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Duhar Chaugan, Alwar (Raj.)
8. Dr. Jitendra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Krishan Gopal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Near Gopal Mandir, Ratlai, Jhalawar. 9. Dharma Saini S/o Shri Kailash Chand Saini, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 25, Ganesh Mandir, Shri Madhopur, Sikar (Raj.)
10. Dr. Meena Vijay W/o Shri Rajeev Vijay, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Plot No. 5, Prajapat Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Behind Patel Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
11. Dr. Raghunandan Sharma S/o Shri Brij Mohan Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Panditji Ka Mohalla, Bagali, Kota (Raj.)
12. Rakesh Kumar Rolaniya S/o Shri Ratan Lal Rolaniya, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Dhani Dungawali, Kant Jaipur (Raj.)
13. Mukesh Kumar Lodha S/o Shri Ram Prasad Lodhan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Melki, Jhalawad (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary
[2026:RJ-JP:24682] (2 of 3) [CW-9806/2026] (Administration), Sanskrit Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur - 302005 (Raj.)
2. The Secretary, Sanskrit Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur - 302005 (Raj.)
3. The Commissioner, Commissionerate, Department Of Sanskrit Education 2Nd Floor, Block-6, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 4. The Joint Director (Hrd), Department Of Sanskrit Education, Block-5, Shiksha Sanku. Jln Marg, Jaipur. 5. The Principal, Smt. Kalawati Devi Mahavar Govt. Acharya Sanskrit College, Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.)
6. The Principal, Govt. Acharya Sanskrit College, Alwar. 7. The Principal, Govt. Acharya Sanskrit College, Salasar, Churu. 8. The Principal, Govt. Shastri Sanskrit College, Sri Ganganagar. 9. The Principal, Govt. Shastri Sanskrit College, Ratlai, Jhalawad. 10. The Principal, Govt. Shastri Sanskrit College, Sinwada Chouhan, Sanchour, Jalor, District Jalor. 11. The Principal, Govt.
V.s.p. Acharya Sanskrit College, Kota (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal with Ms. Priyanka Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chinmaya Saxena, Asst.GC. Mr. Jitendra Takar & Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order 03/07/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue is governed by the Division Bench Judgment of this Court (Jaipur) in
[2026:RJ-JP:24682] (3 of 3) [CW-9806/2026] D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 903/2023; State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (decided on 19.09.2025).
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Department does not refute the above fact. He submits that the petition be
disposed of in light of the same directions as issued in Ram Chaturvedi (supra).
3. In Ram Chaturvedi (supra), the Court directed as under :-
“…….we deem it just and proper to dispose of these appeals and modify the judgment dated 23.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge as follows:- (1) The respondent/original petitioner/applicants are entitled to continue on their respective posts till they are replaced by existing regular employees or regularly selected candidates through RPSC. (2) The respondents/original petitioners/ applicants would be continued on their posts provided that sufficient number of students are available for the particular courses(s) for which they were appointed. (3) The respondents/original petitioners/ applicants would be entitled to honorarium at the rate of Rs.800/- per hour as is being paid to them presently or to be modified by the State from time to time. With the above modification, the present appeals are
disposed of.”
4. The present writ petition is disposed of on the same terms and conditions as above.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J 6/KASHISH