Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:18059
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5338 of 2022 * - Daneshwar Dadsena S/o Shri Pratap Dadsena Aged About 28 Years R/o Ward No. 8 Chandani Chowk, Sahaspur - Lohara, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Through The Secretary, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Controller Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Mr. Rishabh Singh Deo, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 21/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the advertisement dated
25.02.2022. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and direct the respondents to constitute an expert committee for validation of the answers given by the petitioner in respect of question no. 86, 99, 138. 140 and 144. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.21 19:31:28 +0530
2 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities to take opinion of the expert committee regarding the model answer and final answer and thereafter revise the marks/result of the petitioner. 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit. 10.5 Cost of the petition may also be awarded.”
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail remedy available under the law.
3. No objection from other side.
4. Permission granted.
5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti