( 2026:HHC:17390 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.353 of 2026 Date of decision: 15.05.2026 Monisha ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents/State and has placed on record communication dated 11.05.2025 along with office order dated 22.04.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the necessary orders in compliance to the judgment/orders passed by this Court, have been passed by the Deputy Director School Education Kangra at Dharamshala, H.P. vide Order No.EDN-KGR-(E-3), Court Case-Speaking Orders 525-37, dated 22.04.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:17390 ) be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid consideration order dated 22.04.2026, if she still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge May 15, 2026 (reena)