[2026:RJ-JP:11274] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3005/2026 Smt. Santosh Devi W/o Sh. Surendra Singh, R/o Vpo- Mahpalwas, Teh. -Surajgarh, Distt- Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 333033 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Tehsildar, Surajgarh, District- Jhunjhunu, ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartik Lohan, through V.C. Mr. Garvit Chand Mr. Ummed Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 17/03/2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- "In view of the facts and grounds stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:- a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith perform their statutory duties and take action for removal of encroachment from the public Rasta recorded in Khasra Nos.391, going through the khasra no.390 and 386, of Village Mahapalwas; b) Quash and set aside the proposed disposal dated 09.01.2026, being, non-speaking, and based on irrelevant consideration; c) Pass any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [2026:RJ-JP:11274] (2 of 2) [CW-3005/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present matter, the petitioner has submitted a representation, however, no heed was paid to the said representation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). 4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with a direction to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the PLPC. It is further directed that the PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIKSHA MISHRA /22