APHC010560852012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3605] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1106/2012 Between: 1. MOHAMMAD SHAMSUDDIN, S/O.MOHAMMAD GALIB SAHEB RESIDENT OF BESTAPALEM, 29TH WARD, OPPOSITE RAMALAYAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DIST., PRESENTLY R/O.D.NO.12-2-421/6 1ST FLOOR, ALAPATI NAGAR, GUDIMALKAPUR, HYDERABAD. ...APELLANT AND 1. JOGI SATYANANDAM ANR, S/O.RAJA RAO R/O.D.NO.4-10-130, VENGAL VIHAR 12TH WARD, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE STATE OF A P REP BY ITS P P, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. ...RESPODENT(S): Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to submit the memorandum of grounds of criminal appeal to this Hon'ble court against the Judgment of acquittal passed by V Addl. Sessions Judge (FTC) Guntur, in Crl.A. No.129 of 2011 dt.29.8.2012 by reversing the Judgment of conviction passed by Addl. Jr. Civil Judge, Bapatla, Guntur Dist., in CC No.178 of 2009 dt.15.4.2011 on the following and among other. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLAMP 2304 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner in filing the criminal appeal before this Hon'ble 2 High Court against the Judgment in Crl.A.No.129 of 2011 on the file of V Addl. Sessions Judge, (FTC) at Guntur, Guntur Dist., dt.29.8.2012 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CRLAMP 30135 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. CHENNAKESAVULU KOTTE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GANDURI NAGESWARA RAO The Court made the following: 3 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Judgment, dated 29.08.2012 in Crl.A.No.129 of 2011 passed by V Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur, in acquitting the Accused under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the present Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant/Complainant. 2. Mr. K. Chennakesavulu, learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions, submits that the accused is no more. 3. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Appeal is disposed of as abated. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Date : 03-09-2026 BMS