UTTIM CHAUHAN v. MISS AKANKSHA MISHRA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
CAPL/4881/2026 · 2026-09-23
Vikas Budhwar
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9105 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9105 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4881 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non- compliance of the order dated 08.09.2025 passed in Writ C No. 31030 of 2025 which required the opposite party to consider the application of the applicant.
3. Today instructions have been produced according to which, the proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 stands decided on 01.09.2026.
4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel for the applicant.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record, leaving it open for the applicant to question the said order before appropriate forum in accordance with law.
6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as Appendix-A. September 24, 2026 Ashu Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashraf Ali Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Vikas Budhwar,J.) Uttim Chauhan .....Applicant(s) Miss Akanksha Mishra, Sub Divisional Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad