Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 91015 (MAD)

Geetha v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/5403/2026 · 2026-02-27

K Surender

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.5403 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER W.P.(MD)No.5403 of 2026 Geetha ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The District Collector, Viruthunagar District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi Division, Viruthunagar District. 3.The Thasildar, Watrap Taluk, Viruthunagar District. 4.Balu ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry and to cancel the Patta Nos.1348 and 1421 stood in the name of the fourth respondent and to issue patta to the petitioner and her mother in respect of property in Survey Number 493/1B to the total extent of 0.19.0 Ares and 492/1A to the total extent of 0.19.0 Ares, situated at Kalathur Village, Watrap Taluk, ____________ p. 2 W.P.(MD)No.5403 of 2026 Viruthunagar District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 28.08.2025, within a stipulated time as framed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mohanasundaram For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry and to cancel the Patta Nos. 1348 and 1421 stood in the name of the fourth respondent and to issue patta to the petitioner and her mother in respect of property in Survey Nos.493/1B measruing a total extent of 0.19.0 Ares and 492/1A measuring a total extent of 0.19.0 Ares, situated at Kalathur Village, Watrap Taluk, Viruthunagar District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 28.08.2025, within a stipulated time as framed by this Court. 2. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent is hereby dispensed with. ____________ p. 3 W.P.(MD)No.5403 of 2026 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the subject properties. However, the Patta relating to the said properties stands in the name of the fourth respondent. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 28.08.2025 to the respondents 1 to 3 seeking cancellation of the Patta and to issue Patta to her and her mother in respect of the subject properties. However, no action has been taken by the respondents 1 to 3. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 5. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that an enquiry will be conducted and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 6. Recording the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the fourth respondent and any other persons, who may be affected ____________ p. 4 W.P.(MD)No.5403 of 2026 by such decision, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No 27.02.2026 smn2 To:- 1. The District Collector, Viruthunagar District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi Division, Viruthunagar District. 3.The Thasildar, Watrap Taluk, Viruthunagar District. ____________ p. 5 W.P.(MD)No.5403 of 2026 K.SURENDER , J. smn2 W.P.(MD)No.5403 of 2026 27.02.2026 ____________