Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9101 (AP)

B Sririneevasarao, @ Amadaguru Swamy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/22113/2022 · 2026-09-01

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010323442022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22113/2022 Between: 1. B SRIRINEEVASARAO, @ AMADAGURU SWAMY,, S/O LATE B CHANDRASEKAHARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR ASSISTANT, MPDO OFFICE, NALLACHERUVU MANDAL, YSR STATUE OD CHERUVU VILLAGE AND MANDAL ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD ANANTHAPUTAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF SECRETARY, ZILL PRAJA PARISHATH, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, NALLACHERUVU, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents suspending the petitioner from the service dated 30.04.2022 vide orders in R.C.No.A1/911/2022, by the Deputy Chief Secretary Zill Praja Parishath, Ananthapur District, as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, non- application of mind and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to revoke the petitioner by setting aside the suspension order to continue in his service and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to revoke the petitioner by setting aside the suspension order to continue in his service as Junior Assistant in Mandal Praja Parishath Nallacheruvu, Mandal Prishath and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELURU SESHA MAHESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES III 2. GP FOR SERVICES IV 3. B V APARNA LAKSHMI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.22113 OF 2022 ORDER: Sri Chevuri Joseph Kishore, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.09.2026 KBN 4 50 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.22113 of 2022 Date: 02.09.2026 KBN