Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 91 (JHR)

RAVI KUMAR YADAV @ RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./295/2026 · 2026-02-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:5267] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.295 of 2026 ------ Ravi Kumar Yadav @ Ravi Kumar, aged about 23 years, son of Bhukhan Poddar, resident of Shahid Ashram Road, Police Station- Deoghar Town, Post Office- Deoghar, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Pd. Joshi, Advocate Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Md. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P. For the Victim : Mr. Sudhanshu Kr. Deo, Advocate ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-20-02-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No.490 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(4), 352, 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has attempted to commit murder of his wife by assaulting her with a knife and locked the flat from outside. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.11.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-12 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the victim namely Suman Singh or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes that he will not enter into the local limit jurisdiction of Deoghar Town Police Station during the pendency of this case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the victim opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No.490 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victim namely Suman Singh or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case and he will also not enter into the local limit jurisdiction of Deoghar Town Police Station during the pendency of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 20.02.2026 Saroj/