Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010160852022 2026:GAU-AS:9195 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5434/2022 JIREN TANI S/O KALEP MURA @ KALEP CHRISTIAN @ KALEP TANI, VILL.- BOGPARA GAON, P.O. AND P.S.- MORANHAT, DIST.- CHARAIDEO (ASSAM), PIN- 785670. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6. 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHARAIDEO COURT ROAD SONARI PIN- 785690. 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHARAIDEO BORAHI BAGAN ALI ROAD SONARI PIN- 785690. 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER MAHMORA REVENUE CIRCLE KAALIBARI MORAHAT TOWN PIN- 785690. 5:INDICA GOGOI THE CIRCLE OFFICER Page No.# 2/3 MAHMORA REVENUE CIRCLE KAALIBARI MORAHAT TOWN PIN- 785670. 6:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE MORANHAT POLICE STATION AT MORANHAT TOWN PIN- 786613. 7:ATUL PATOR THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE MORANHAT POLICE STATION AT MORANHAT TOWN PIN- 786613. 8:ANANDA TANTI S/O MEGHNATH TANTI VILL.- KHOOMTALE GAON P.O. AND P.S.- MORANHAT DIST.- CHARAIDEO (ASSAM) PIN- 785670 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. P. Borah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Borpujari, Advocate Mr. N. Goswami, Govt. Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 22.06.2026 Heard Mr. D. P. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Mr. R. Borpujari, the learned counsel Page No.# 3/3 appears on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Mr. N. Goswami, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos.2, 3, 4 & 6. 2. The instant writ petition so filed is a complete abuse of the process of the Court in as much as the Petitioner herein in spite of a suit being Title Suit No.19/2022 pending before the learned Court of the Munsiff at Charaideo has filed the instant writ petition seeking a direction upon the District Administration that the Private Respondents should be evicted from the land of the Petitioner. 3. It is the opinion of this Court that the instant writ petition is not maintainable in as much as the public law remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be invoked for settling personal scores between the Petitioner and the Private Respondents. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition, being an abuse of the process of the Court, stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant