Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9089 (UTT)

SUNITA BHATT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/2000/2026 · 2026-07-29

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010132172026 2026:UHC:6527 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2000/2026 Sunita Bhatt --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. Narain Dutt, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 3. After arguing at length, learned Counsel for petitioner sought permission to withdraw present writ petition permitting him to avail the statutory remedy available to him of filing claim petition before the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal constituted under the provisions of U.P. Public Service (Tribunals) Act, 1976, as applicable in Uttarakhand. 4. In view of the submission made by learned Counsel for petitioner, permission to withdraw this writ petition is granted. 5. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a claim petition strictly as per law before the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 29.07.2026 R.Dang